Sunday, 22 October 2017

Despair

I had not been to see the Boro play since August due to holidays and the ways of the fixture list. During that time to say the team had not set the world alight is an understatement, they had both lost and drawn with teams that they should have beaten. But your diehard football fan is not without conviction so it was almost like the start of a new season when I travelled to the ground yesterday. I was full of optimism.

It also marked the change of the seasons, for the first time I had a heavy coat on against the strong wind and frequent heavy rain showers. But still football is a winter game, best enjoyed cold as they say. What followed was a dismal performance that brought me down to earth. Once again I witnessed a side that could not force the opposition goalkeeper into a decent save. Almost inevitably there was the sucker punch as the opposition were awarded a penalty.


So that was it, so much hope, but after ninety minutes, despair. The bizarre thing about being a football fan is that before the next home game I will be optimistic again!!

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

Myths

Yesterday before storm Ophelia hit it was a warm morning. I had some business to do in town so I decided to walk by way of the seafront. The seafront road in Scarborough stretches for about two miles connecting the North and South Bays. It winds its way around the Castle Headland and on a warm autumn morning with few people around is an absolute joy.

Walking is a time for thought and this walk reminded me of a couple of things that first seemed unrelated, geographically and historically remote from each other. But when I started to think about it they were very much of relevance to each other. At a dinner party recently I was expounding boringly on my thoughts for pedestrianising part of the seafront, specifically the road on South Bay. I feel strongly that the dual carriageway there cuts the town off from the sea, and prevents the area being used to its full potential. I see the seafront as one large piazza full of performance spaces, cafes, and pop-up events. It would be rescued from the belching diesel fumes particularly those from superannuated open-top buses. As usual I am a prophet before my time and I was derided, particularly on the evidence free grounds that it would cause congestion in the town centre and increase journey times particularly from north to south.

I was reminded of this conversation as I read Robert Caro’s The Power Broker, a biography of Robert Moses who was responsible for re-imagining and physically re-shaping New York in the mid-Twentieth Century. Essentially it is a brilliant study of power and how power corrupts. I had read about the extension of roads along the western part of Manhattan Island. Moses believed that these roads were needed to cut journey times in the city. His opponents saw them as despoiling a natural resource that could never be re-created. The river and its environment were forever lost to New Yorkers beneath an ugly road. But the final irony is that the road quickly became jammed and journey times were not improved at all. Like hydra though as one road jammed Moses always thought the solution was just one more road!

This is particularly relevant to Scarborough seafront, the argument being that the seafront road saves time in driving from north to south. Now that maybe is true although I suspect that the gains are marginal. But what it does show is that we value our right to mobility above that of the environment. As a society we think we should have the right to travel quickly between places ignoring the interests of the majority. We do not think that the individual should adjust their behaviour to the benefit of all.


My argument is that if we act as a society we prioritise to the values of that society. Mobility is great but it is not a right particularly when it comes to speed. The additional cost of five minutes is for a few marginal, particularly when it is at the cost of dis-benefit to the majority. So surprising, as it may seem Robert Moses’ desecration of the Manhattan waterfront has huge lessons for Scarborough seafront. As I say I can be extremely boring about this.

Monday, 16 October 2017

Beautiful Autumn

On Saturday we travelled to Poole to see Marion’s parents. The afternoon was spectacular, it was very warm for October and there was little wind. I took the opportunity to walk along the promenade from Sandbanks to Bournemouth Pier. It was so warm that many were swimming in the sea, including Laura.
The ice-cream stalls were doing a roaring business. It seemed like the last hurrah of summer, certainly the last time that I would wear shorts before next spring.

The autumn season does give some wonderful effects. Returning around the bay past Evening Hill I captured a great scene as the sun set over Brownsea Island.
The hill was truly justifying its name. A group had set up a table-clothed picnic table complete with champagne to celebrate the evening, to add to the atmosphere. Later when I taxied three generations of the ladies out to dinner the conditions had the effect of giving the water a light coating of mist out of which the masts of boats poked.


Truly nature had put on a wonderful show. For me it was not quite finished as I caught the train back to Scarborough yesterday. I walked across London from Waterloo to Kings Cross. The view from Waterloo Bridge across to St. Paul’s and the City were fabulous. London looked it’s best!

The metrological effects are not quite over yet, the impending Ophelia storm combined with dust in the atmosphere from the terrible fires in Portugal gave the sky a strange washed out patina all day. Unfortunately I did not manage to capture the full impact.

Saturday, 14 October 2017

Stimulating Theatre

Last night we visited the West Yorkshire Playhouse in Leeds. We have been going for many years, during which time we have seen some exceptional productions and a very few that should never have seen the light of day. Yesterday was very interesting as what I had expected was a musical, what I got was one of the most overtly political evenings that I have experienced in the theatre.

The play was titled “Reasons to be Cheerful” and was described as a raucous musical featuring the hits of Ian Dury and the Blockheads. So far so good, I was expecting a musical run through the life of Ian Dury interspersed with songs. Note here for foreign readers and those of a certain age, Ian Dury and the Blockheads were a rock and roll group of the late seventies, though perhaps they defied simple genre classification. They occupied a space between rock and roll and punk. What was most striking were their lyrics, a typical example of which was "I had a love affair with Nina, In the back of my Cortina. A seasoned-up hyena could not have been more obscener". There records were frequently banned by the BBC but have since achieved recognition and respectability. Spasticus Autisticus a polemic against the patronising nature of society towards disability was banned, but thirty years later was used in the opening ceremony of the London Olympics.

So the production had great music to work with, albeit within a sentimental script. The cast brought huge vitality to the play, and what was significant was the theatre company Graeae promote the use of disabled actors. Dury himself was affected by childhood polio and some of his lyrics reflect this. My daughter has met the founder of this company and found her inspirational. Certainly last night they performed with a verve that I have seldom seen in the theatre. To have an audience of middle class Yorkshire people on their feet chanting “Sex and Dugs and Rock roll” while simultaneously thrusting with their pelvis was one of my more surreal theatre experiences.

Two things really stood out for me, one was the social history; the musical was set in the East End of London in 1979. What it portrayed was the white working class culture of the area and its overspill into Essex. Lyrics were littered with place names. However when I started to think about this I realised that this was now history, a newer Muslim immigrant community now dominates the areas it portrayed. Socially and culturally they are unrecognisable from Dury’s time, so the play acted for me as nostalgic although not schmaltzy social history.

The musical ended with a political number written by the company. This was essentially a protest song against the lack of government support for people with disabilities. It was a powerful song with some interesting graphics. Two things stood out. When a picture of Theresa May was shown the audience booed. Several right wing figures were portrayed as the devil, but here I parted way with the company, juxtaposing Nigel Farage and Tony Blair in this way I thought was facile. Whatever ones opinion of Blair’s Iraq adventure, society under his government became more equal, many social issues were tackled in a way that they have not been since.


Overall though I suppose that this is what good theatre is supposed to do, to challenge and stimulate debate and thought. It is in this respect that I wish the Graeae Company every success, and will certainly try to see their productions in future.

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

Lecture Nerves

Today was a return to academic work, with this time a definite end in mind. At the end of November I am due to give my first academic paper in public at Reading University. Now I have given all types of presentations before and never really felt nervous, however for this the butterflies have already started. Perhaps because it is a step into the unknown, perhaps because the audience will comprise people with far more experience and knowledge in the field of Transport History than I have. One of my academic heroes will be there, Mark Casson who wrote a book hypothesising the alternative development of the Victorian Railway network. I suppose that this is the significant difference, in the past I have felt in command of the subject, which I will have as much if not more knowledge than the audience, this time I am concerned that my research might be wanting.

Those who know me will not be surprised that it is quite a niche subject, specifically how if at all the surplus of lorries after World War One contributed to kick starting road freight transport in this country. It is interesting because the 1920’s marked the start of the freight moving in significant quantities by road, one of the contributors to that is always cited as the availability of cheap war-surplus lorries. The truth is as you might expect far more nuanced than that. Now the beauty of academic argument is that this is only an opinion, albeit backed-up by research. Others can and will diverge from this. So I am marshalling my facts in preparation for I hope a lively discussion. It will also be great to test my academic credentials for the first time. I will report back as to how it goes.