Tonight
we ventured to see The Shape of Water at the cinema in Malton. Having seen
previous Guillermo del Toro films I was prepared that this would not be a run
of the mill cinema experience. The question was would it eclipse the other Oscar
contenders that we had seen?
While
I was not disappointed it was certainly striking. It was visually sumptuous and
the cinematographic detail was stunning. I thought that it had all the subtlety
that The Post did not have. It made its points with clarity without signposting
them or ramming them down the viewers throat. The evocation of early 1960’s USA
was impressive, particularly the way it contrasted with the flife of the
heroine.
I am
sure you can envisage a but coming here, the basic story line was very
challenging for some one who is not a lover of either science fiction or fairy
tales. That said I think that it absolutely worked. I think that the love story
was touchingly portrayed, and I was able to suspend my belief.
Significantly
when we went to the pub after it provoked a huge amount of discussion, which of
course is the sign of a good film. Where does it stand in my Oscar standings,
well the more I think about it The Post seems to be a narrow film that misses
the enormity of the subject it was dealing with. Three Billboards on the other
hand has remained with me as a moving film. I think that the Shape of Water is
a wildcard, it is not a mainstream film but…….
Interesting review!
ReplyDeleteI loved the film and the sci-fi element almost seemed incidental; at points I forgot about it. It may be more mainstream than you think. I thought Sally Hawkins was arresting.
The colours, green, blue and 'that' flicker of red were a story in themselves. I loved, loved, loved it.