I have been reading a long article about the chief
designer of Apple Jonathon Ive, a great British genius, although in the way of
all British genii he has taken American citizenship. I find such articles about
the inner workings of corporations fascinating and compelling.
Apple is the most profitable corporation on the
planet and has produced a series of must have products which appear to be
design led. They appear to have overcome the death of Steve Jobs their
charismatic CEO. The article was autobiographical tracing Ive’s early life in
Chingford and Stafford and his early years at University and his first design
ventures.
What was less clear was how he rose to the top at
Apple, was he a good leader, and was he solely responsible for the IMac design.
All this appeared to be a little bit problematic. There were some dark hints
that he had a type of Machiavellian relationship with Steve Jobs, which seemed
to exclude other colleagues.
So what we got was a slightly reverential article
where all the deigns were an astounding success, and there were fawning
comments from peers and peripheral celebrities like Stephen Fry and Bono. I
felt I was reading one long PR puff piece. To my mind there must have been huge
debate and lots of multi-disciplinary processes around bringing a product like
the Ipad to market. I cannot imagine that all was sweetness and light
throughout the process. Unfortunately in such articles you are only getting the
perspective from the winners, the masters of the universe.
The other impression I received is that companies are
a lot easier to run when money is not a constraint. For instance the deign team
has three permanent recruitment advisors, and they hire on average one designer
a year. Now no average company could afford this ratio.
So I read a long article but really had no insight
into Apple or its design team. Probably it is like an Apple Shop, a lot of
gloss but no real substance.
No comments:
Post a Comment